Teebee's remixing Ni Ten Ichi Ryu

erbanta is like one of those annoying, gum-on-the-shoe nerds we used to stuff into the sink in high school.

i have a sneaking suspicion that the reason people like erbanta and dak are picking e-fights with me nowadays is that i come from that exact same place and they used to identify with my approach, so to watch me come to grips with my inner asshole probably rubs them totally the wrong way :P

it's kinda ironic that the only people that have been annoying and over analyzing with me on this board are exactly those two. at least we know where the problem lies.

p.s. it's better to discover an inner asshole than an inner girl

[Statto]

p.s. it's better to discover an inner asshole than an inner girl

I disagree entirely :P

p.s. it's better to discover an inner asshole than an inner girl

like there's any difference!?! they're both things to put your inner dick in

p.s. it's better to discover an inner asshole than an inner girl

like there's any difference!?! they're both things to put your inner dick in

LOL

dividing and building barriers is useful, but i do it in a tentative sense; what's built up today should be chopped down tomorrow, because they reflect a world that's always in flux.

what's the hurry? are you afraid of that you may grow too fond of the barrier (don't see nothing wrong with this kind of attachment, as long as your emotions aren't the one who's running you!), or that the barrier might fall in before you can pull it down yourself? sounds like unnecessary hastiness to me; it's not like you'll suddenly forget what the world is like!

i'm not sure how important a piece i have just grabbed, but this image of obsession about contemporariness i've got seems very limiting. again, it's as if you're not willing to fully get into it.

the two are very much mutually exclusive if you compare them as existing in the same domain; however, since i see one domain as the reflection of the other, they're exactly the same tool, 'flipped' according to which domain we're dealing with. they both deal with the problem of subverting fear.

i think i understand this analogy, but it sounds a bit impractical to me, like using old netscape for a browser but whatever, fair play :d

intellectual fear is being intimidated by an idea because of who it's coming from; by wielding the belief that everything is equally worthless shit, you can chop down all the status and credibility spin that surrounds everybody's beliefs every time they sell them (myself included - don't believe your own belief system any more than you believe anybody else's bs), and try to see the idea more objectively. it's an ongoing fight, not an instant win.

i understand the use of this type of excorcism, but i don't understand why you even need to emphatize other ppl's reaction this much; from one perspective this even seems like an inaccurate technique.

in roughly said about 98% cases of rationalized fear the fear itself has nothing to do with these adopted reasons, but is actually an irrational fear, something so deep and distressing that the ego (that in any way shouldn't be the driving force!) is making up other, usually external rationalizations for the fear so that it becomes easier to handle. on this case the essential dialogue the person is imaginarily going with other ppl really has nothing to do with other ppl, it's all in the head and the imagined persons arguing are actualy just different parts of the ego clashing together! tail shouldn't wag the dog..

there is no instant win true, there is no instant anything, but a something more final than an evergoing struggle can be achieved with certain, suitable techniques.

'actual' fear is being intimidated by the tangible consequences of putting an idea into action; by wielding the belief that i should be doing everything i want to do, on one hand, i'm doing more of what i want to do, and on the other hand, it gets me ready to stand up for my right to do it in case i have to face the consequences. again, an ongoing fight, not an instant win.

there's nothing that can be done about erasing fear, but it can be overcomed. i'll quote some castaneda later, i summarized this quite neatly.

believe that everything is worthless shit, and law becomes the only form of tangible consequence. that's not to remove people's feelings from the equation, but quite the opposite; rather, it removes the intellectual abstraction of "other people's feelings" from the equation, so you have to look them in the eyes and deal with them on the level of a human connection.

when you decide to raise above others, you don't have to keep on telling this. if it is your will to treat others like ants when necessary, so it shall be, and from that on you could concentrate more on yourself.



wizard: if you want to reach my interest you'll have to do a bit better than that.

and just when have i been "over analyzing" you? can't remember doing that, can't remember even talking to you much really! honestly, this is not some "i'm sorry, who are you again?" bullshit which'd imply that i actually wanted to further this beef you're giving me, i really don't remember doing any of that!

i have a sneaking suspicion that the reason people like erbanta and dak are picking e-fights with me nowadays is that i come from that exact same place and they used to identify with my approach, so to watch me come to grips with my inner asshole probably rubs them totally the wrong way

i'm only here because of the fun of it (and possible useful data), don't think so damn much of yourself since i haven't forgot to think of you as a project! it's true that years ago you made sense, but from that on you've only started to make even more sense.

what's the hurry?

i can't win with you, can i? it's not about speed, it's about getting my hands dirty instead of sitting around talking about it, just like you were talking about 7 pages ago!!!!!!

i can hang out here all day long turning the internet into my existentialist playground, but if i'm not turning around and destroying barriers and building new ones like a good existentialist should, it's a bunch of meaningless hot air. y'all can believe it's all a bunch of meaningless hot air either way - i take actions for MY sake and to live up to MY ideals, not so i have a list of accomplishments i can throw in people's faces when they don't think my philosophical arguments are credible

don't think so damn much of yourself

i don't have to - the fact that you're still here arguing with me as though you've got something to prove says all i need to know.

and just when have i been "over analyzing" you? can't remember doing that, can't remember even talking to you much really! honestly, this is not some "i'm sorry, who are you again?" bullshit which'd imply that i actually wanted to further this beef you're giving me, i really don't remember doing any of that!

an old klute thread and an old photek thread.

you've hit your pretty keyboard buttons so often that it's no surprise you don't remember.

i want to buttsex fanu

who's fanu?

it's kinda ironic that the only people that have been annoying and over analyzing with me on this board are exactly those two. at least we know where the problem lies.

before you get all high and mighty you might want to consider that from my viewpoint the situation is exactly the opposite, the only people that have been annoying and over analyzing with me on this board are exactly you and Scart

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

i can't win with you, can i? it's not about speed, it's about getting my hands dirty instead of sitting around talking about it, just like you were talking about 7 pages ago!!!!!!

if you're bored with this, then we can stop it right now.

my final words: i think existentialism is similar to agnosticism. both are dishonest philosophies and only really exist on paper.

now have yours if you will and call it a day.

i don't have to - the fact that you're still here arguing with me as though you've got something to prove says all i need to know.

and i could say just as well that the fact that you haven't left a single post unreplied but have dodged several points repeatedly with word plays proves enough about your motives, but wouldn't we get a bit emotional then?

an old klute thread and an old photek thread.

you've hit your pretty keyboard buttons so often that it's no surprise you don't remember.

ok i just checked it out.

on the other photek thread i made you one on-topic post, in which you were too busy to fight with dak to reply. no analyzing your personality on my part over there

on the klute's latest lp thread i wrote a few more on-topic posts and told you that you are an odd individual. over analyzing

you're no fun.

If ever a thread was in need of a good crappering...

A new clip: http://mp3.breakbeat.is/breakbeat/dubs/p...beermx.mp3


I think he did a very good job on this one, imho.

KILL THEM SCARTY.

Syndicat des Constructeurs d'Appareils Radiorécepteurs et Téléviseurs

WHAT DID I TELL ALL OF YOU =P

funny thread actually took the time to read it...twice
way too bored...
on topic: the remix isn't bad, but it's not the original
off topic: funny to see people acting all high and mighty and then have the guts to call others elitists...
way off topic: discovering an inner asshole is only good if you're used to masturbating and want something new...an inner girl on the contrary...

it's an ugly thread yes, but very enjoyable IMO

A new clip: http://mp3.breakbeat.is/breakbeat/dubs/p...beermx.mp3


I think he did a very good job on this one, imho.

Hummmmm let me check












######## after check #########


I liked