subvert central â the label
the success of the subvert central forum has been that a group of like-minded people have come together, an international community of subverts with similar aims and hopes in music. the first fruit of this community was the proposed network, which had the ambitious aim of uniting the various individual projects into a functioning whole. unfortunately this scheme got bogged down in trivialities, in particular the failure of the network to agree even upon a name for itself. therefore blue proposed something more practical: to coordinate our efforts on a single project. to start a label.
the response to the initial thread was extremely positive as people recognised two things: firstly, a direct path along which we could move forward. secondly, a way to contribute without having to make too large a commitment. as blue outlined the various tasks involved in running a label, volunteers came forward.
so far, so good. but why would we want another label? a recent interview, conducted by the outlaw, with brett from the offshore label highlights some pertinent issues:
in the current fertile atmosphere (here and elsewhere) a lot of exciting new music is being made. but far more music than the friendly labels â offshore, bassbin, inperspective, streetbeats, etc. â can possibly handle. at the present rate of release this music will appear in six months, a year, two years, if at all. the trouble is that running a label takes a lot of time and effort and the people involved already have plenty of things to do: making their own music, promoting their labels and events and, not least, working in proper jobs. and even more significantly: releasing records costs money and individuals have only so much.
at the moment these labels are kept afloat by enthusiasm. individuals label managers and crews fund the records, supported retrospectively by the small group of grassroots enthusiasts who buy them at £5 or £6 a time. occasionally a particular release may make a small profit, more often they won't. either way, after each record everything is set on hold until a label again has both the money and the time to release another record which the grassroots can then buy, and so on.
this is the standard top-down method by which labels are run, but it is clearly not very efficient. subvert central the label therefore takes the logical step and reverses the process. by working as a collective drawn from the grassroots we can overcome the usual obstacles. the collective puts the money up front, funding the records in advance, and thus the financial restraints on releasing records are reduced. by sharing out the tasks involved in running a label the obstacles of time and effort are also diminished. no one has to do too much work, no one has to pay or risk too much money.
the advantageous corollaries to this bottom-up structure are soon apparent. with ever more contributors the financial burden on each member of the collective is reduced to a negligible level and the usual market demands on a label are eliminated. while we of course hope that our records will be successful, it is not a matter of life and death for the label if they are not, since no one has too much at stake. thus, with no need to worry about sales figures, we can put out whatever stuff we want. formats may perhaps be adjusted to fit the needs of our main genre (drum and bass) â for instance, the ease with which a record can be utilised by working djs. but there is no need to compromise the music itself in any way. we can release the music we want to hear and that we truly believe in, without fear and without delay.
the success of the subvert central forum has been that a group of like-minded people have come together, an international community of subverts with similar aims and hopes in music. the first fruit of this community was the proposed network, which had the ambitious aim of uniting the various individual projects into a functioning whole. unfortunately this scheme got bogged down in trivialities, in particular the failure of the network to agree even upon a name for itself. therefore blue proposed something more practical: to coordinate our efforts on a single project. to start a label.
blue Wrote:i firmly believe that we should start up a subvert central label to help bring things in together a bit more.
we could all help fund it (those who are willing to be involved) and put out consistent subversive material. i'm sure that srd would get involved. i'm sure that we could make it a success.
i mean how many top notch artists hang out up here man?
the response to the initial thread was extremely positive as people recognised two things: firstly, a direct path along which we could move forward. secondly, a way to contribute without having to make too large a commitment. as blue outlined the various tasks involved in running a label, volunteers came forward.
so far, so good. but why would we want another label? a recent interview, conducted by the outlaw, with brett from the offshore label highlights some pertinent issues:
the outlaw Wrote:what would you say is the philosophy behind your label?
brett Wrote:there are loads â challenge the status quo, give an outlet to amazing music, burn some goddamn bridges, keep things interesting and experimental, push forward drum & bass, do some crazy shit.
the outlaw Wrote:how does a label like yours find an audience?
brett Wrote:i am not going to lie; it is extremely difficult. there are days when i wake up and think that i am wasting my time, effort and money. then i go to work and listen to the drivel that most dnb has become and think about those that support offshore and always have. it is really a grassroots type of deal. you can go on doa and do a search and you will find people that post about offshore regularly. those are the people that keep offshore going, just to know that people are out there that relate and really appreciate what offshore is trying to do.
in the current fertile atmosphere (here and elsewhere) a lot of exciting new music is being made. but far more music than the friendly labels â offshore, bassbin, inperspective, streetbeats, etc. â can possibly handle. at the present rate of release this music will appear in six months, a year, two years, if at all. the trouble is that running a label takes a lot of time and effort and the people involved already have plenty of things to do: making their own music, promoting their labels and events and, not least, working in proper jobs. and even more significantly: releasing records costs money and individuals have only so much.
at the moment these labels are kept afloat by enthusiasm. individuals label managers and crews fund the records, supported retrospectively by the small group of grassroots enthusiasts who buy them at £5 or £6 a time. occasionally a particular release may make a small profit, more often they won't. either way, after each record everything is set on hold until a label again has both the money and the time to release another record which the grassroots can then buy, and so on.
this is the standard top-down method by which labels are run, but it is clearly not very efficient. subvert central the label therefore takes the logical step and reverses the process. by working as a collective drawn from the grassroots we can overcome the usual obstacles. the collective puts the money up front, funding the records in advance, and thus the financial restraints on releasing records are reduced. by sharing out the tasks involved in running a label the obstacles of time and effort are also diminished. no one has to do too much work, no one has to pay or risk too much money.
the advantageous corollaries to this bottom-up structure are soon apparent. with ever more contributors the financial burden on each member of the collective is reduced to a negligible level and the usual market demands on a label are eliminated. while we of course hope that our records will be successful, it is not a matter of life and death for the label if they are not, since no one has too much at stake. thus, with no need to worry about sales figures, we can put out whatever stuff we want. formats may perhaps be adjusted to fit the needs of our main genre (drum and bass) â for instance, the ease with which a record can be utilised by working djs. but there is no need to compromise the music itself in any way. we can release the music we want to hear and that we truly believe in, without fear and without delay.
code Wrote:if so many people are willing to contribute money then maybe we can make this label as idealistic as possible???!
düffah Wrote:the sound of the future and the core of a new movement â subvert central!
crystl / trace & nico' Wrote:we are a group trying to accomplish one thing: that is to get into the future.