ahh, dunno.
oh well, yes, that's why everybody played it nonstop on the radio and it sold a zillion copies.
if that guy is suffering so hard, then ffs put an expander on the tune
but seriously, of course the thing about ear fatigue is interesting. i actually can't tell if i listen to less music in a row these days than i used to. i'd say no. then again i tend to not listen to albums too much. and if so, it's usually not current pop. and surely not 3-4 dnb tunes in a row at high volume.
so, what's the bottom line?
i think it's basically the same thing as complaining about "the state of d'n'b" or something similar, if you get me. it's a bit of a don quichotte thing.
just do different if your dissatisfied and take the consequences if no one likes to play dynamically unaltered music (but your -11db average rms seem to be fairly common pop-standard level
)
we're not doing classical string quartets here, but certainly it's something to consider. i've always felt my music sounded better, when it had a certain level of loudness and punch - but i think i dispose of a certain built-in level of decency, which keeps me from distorting the shit out of tunes anyway. ermm, at least i think so
that guy Wrote:thanks to folks on the internet, there are lists of famously loud cds. the red hot chili pepper's 1999 album "californication" is a notorious example. it clips constantly, and the title track peaks at a whopping minus 5.6 db, which was really uncomfortable for almost everybody.
oh well, yes, that's why everybody played it nonstop on the radio and it sold a zillion copies.if that guy is suffering so hard, then ffs put an expander on the tune
but seriously, of course the thing about ear fatigue is interesting. i actually can't tell if i listen to less music in a row these days than i used to. i'd say no. then again i tend to not listen to albums too much. and if so, it's usually not current pop. and surely not 3-4 dnb tunes in a row at high volume.
so, what's the bottom line?
i think it's basically the same thing as complaining about "the state of d'n'b" or something similar, if you get me. it's a bit of a don quichotte thing.
just do different if your dissatisfied and take the consequences if no one likes to play dynamically unaltered music (but your -11db average rms seem to be fairly common pop-standard level
)we're not doing classical string quartets here, but certainly it's something to consider. i've always felt my music sounded better, when it had a certain level of loudness and punch - but i think i dispose of a certain built-in level of decency, which keeps me from distorting the shit out of tunes anyway. ermm, at least i think so
but 